THE ROLE OF SOCIAL NETWORK APPLICATIONS IN OPEN EDUCATION

Abstract

Open education is a key to removing education gap among people around the globe. With the development of the internet, open education has acquired a sustainable and effective channel of production, sharing, and access to Open Educational Resources (OER). Through social media platforms, students, educators, schools, and movements can interact, learn and help solve problems and challenges in education. The development of smartphone social network applications is even influential as access to open education can be done on the go, anytime and anywhere than web-based applications. In addition, most of the smartphone devices compatible with the applications are becoming cheaper due to mass production and this gives the opportunity to many people who cannot afford a personal computer to, therefore, have access to OERs. This positions the social network applications at a more crucial role in the production, sharing and access to Open education and this is what the paper is intended to analyze.  

Keywords: Open-Education, Social media, Social Network Apps, Open Educational Resources (OERs)

Introduction

For a long time, many people, especially the poor, have been faced with challenges of poor education due to an insufficiency of resources, poor quality and outdated content due to the challenge of higher costs of production and delivery. However, the advancement of internet and computer connections have eased the situation by providing better means of producing, sharing and accessing educational content. Blogs, Facebook, Twitter, Myspace, and YouTube, among others, have facilitated people to socially interact and collaborate whilst creating and sharing quality open educational resources. Historically, the way people used to access the internet has also changed. A decade ago people needed a personal computer or desktop to access the web-based platforms to socialize and access content. Today, the smartphone technology has facilitated a very modern way of staying connected, socializing, sharing and accessing the open content. Many people are now connected on the go with the affordable smartphones compared to personal computers.

It is, therefore, in this sense that various smartphone applications have been developed to increase the connectivity among people on the go. At the same time, this has an impact as it increases the engagement of people in teaching and learning. From this perspective, social network applications have a huge impact on both increasing access and openness to open educational resources and also creates freedom and flexibility for people to learn anytime and anywhere. This paper specifically looks at the role that social network applications do have in open education. It specifically analyzes the characteristics that applications have which impact open education.

Open Education

According to Wiley, D (2012), education is about “sharing” of knowledge and without it, education has no essence. Sharing allows people to construct a new understanding of the world around us. Development of skills and competencies only happen through acts of interaction where people discuss, research, critique, and solve problems and challenges. Through sharing, education, therefore, becomes an important factor in the development of our communities and the global society at large. In fact, the rapid changes that man has experienced over the past century are as a consequence of the effect of sharing in education.

Biswas-Diener and Jhangiani (2017) argue that: Despite the fact that education must be a fundamental human right, history has it that education was and still is, in some cases, seem to be only for the elite and the upper class. This is because education is tied to huge costs in terms of tuition, access to books, and minimum space in the schools, colleges, and universities. This, therefore, robes the opportunity or the right for everyone around the globe to access quality education.  In response to this, individuals, groups, and institutions have resorted to the development of the concept of open education and have established movements which advocate the right to education to people in need around the world at low or no cost at all.

Open education is regarded as a philosophy which focuses on how people should develop, construct and share knowledge, skills, and competencies (opensource.com).  It is developed and structured to provide access to “extremely efficient and affordable sharing” (Wiley, 2012, p.82) and it embraces all teaching and learning resources, methodologies and tools which are in line with promoting quality, access and effectiveness to teaching and learning worldwide (Open Education Consortium). Around this philosophy of open education, it is believed that the students acquire the personal agency, determination and autonomous (Blessinger & Bliss, 2016). In other ways, open education is concerned with eliminating the barriers and brings equality among the people to access quality education despite the social, political, and economic status.  Biswas and Jhangiani, (2017) make it a point about why it is important to deal with educational inequalities among the people from all classes of the society that:

The real tragedy of poverty is not that the poor need more opportunities to be factory foremen, office managers or stock traders. The real tragedy is the loss of every scientific discovery, artistic work, invention, new business, and cultivated mind because of lack of opportunity according to random chance at birth. (Biswas & Jhangiani, 2017, p 5)

The statement here proves that the better way of solving the problem of poverty and promoting the sustainability of the globe is through open education. People must have access to the information, and communication that is crucial to everyday realities.

Driving forces of Open Education

  1. Societal problems and challenges

Significant reasons for the promotion of open education have been documented by many individuals and movements concerned with equal access to quality and effective education. A research done around the world before the year 2000, revealed that many poor people failed to pursue their dreams in education due to huge costs, long distances, poor quality, and lack of self-esteem among others (Biswas-Diener & Jhangiani, 2017). It is noticeable in the developing countries that governments do fail to provide sufficient infrastructure, teaching and learning materials and tools, and lack of enough and well-trained teachers to facilitate learning processes. In many cases books are scarce and expensive hence both teachers and students are forced to use the same books for many years and become outdated before they are replaced.

In the developed countries, the question of access is not mostly in the infrastructures and lack of teaching and learning materials, rather it is in the sense of costs of accessing such education. People with the quest of higher education are discouraged to proceed with their studies due to higher costs of it, or they are left with an alternative option of choosing to participate in low standard education schools and universities or risk falling in debt trap after graduation to attend prestigious and expensive universities. According to DiGangi (2017), an online news reporter of USA TODAY reported that students’ debt has gone above a trillion dollars in the USA alone by 2017, and for the first time it has surpassed credit card debt. In addition, extra costs such as books are very high too. Wiley, D (2012) reported that the cost of books had risen up and that students spent at least 25 percent of the total cost of the 4-year university course on books.

Furthermore, Biswas-diener & Jhangiani (2017) documented that the existence of disparities among the people from racial perspective is another factor causing many people to fail attending or to acquire quality education. Biswas-diener & Jhangiani (2017) observed that states whose large population is the ruling or upper class, are likely to have improved systems of education than states whose population is just the working or poor class. This situation is similar in the developing nations like Malawi where the better schools with better conditions of teaching and learning are only found in the cities. Besides that, in many cases, the disparities which may seem a bit racial are evident in the best international schools where mostly, only those with money can attend such higher standard levels of education.

  1. Technological advancement

A century or more ago, information and communication speeds were so slow in the way that it contradicted with the philosophy behind open education. Taking sharing or openness as a main focus in education to give equal learning opportunities to all could not sound as good as it sounds today. Such a philosophy was futuristic at that time. People who advocated for open education were faced with a challenge of finding a better strategy of how they could easily make the open content, materials etc. available to all. For instance, the cost of publishing a book was very high and despite that transportation of it to reach to the people in need was another challenge. In fact, such a philosophy was not sustainable at that time.

As new discoveries became realized, such as radio and television, Open education became a dream come true. Educational radio and TV Programs were aired and people who wanted to learn sat in front of TV or radio, learning and therefore achieving the status of the learned in the society.

A few decades ago internet technology was discovered and therefore speeds of information and communication accelerated and reached the ground-breaking velocity that man had ever imagined. The society’s way of living has changed so much compared to the era before the internet. Communicating has become so much easier and very instant. People have become very connected not only from within their local communities but to the whole globe. It has become very easy to create new relationships with people from diverse cultures and societies. Social networks and communities have been developed and established. People have moved from using landline telecommunication to mobile means. Production and access to information have been centralized, and intelligence has become collective. People are now online more than ever due to the Smartphone and Applications technologies. In fact, the internet technology is affordable in that even poor nations have the systems working. In general, the internet boom has changed the global ways and means of living. It has created a new culture and Levy (2001), coined this new culture a “cyberculture”.

It is therefore that from the growth of the internet, the philosophy of open learning makes a very good sense as it found a very sustainable strategy of giving open education to the masses. In fact, the evolution of internet technology is one of the greatest forces in the implementation of Open Education. This is emphasized by Selwyn, N (2014) who puts it that:

…both the Internet and education are concerned with information exchange, communication, and the creation of knowledge. The participatory, communal nature of many social Internet applications and activities is aligned closely with the fundamental qualities of how humans learn, not least the practices of creating, sharing, collaborating, and critiquing. (Selwyn, N, The internet, and Education)

The point made here is very important because it gives a clear and concrete relationship about how the internet can be used as a tool for delivering teaching and learning processes. Seylwn, (2014) provides four important points in which the internet functions and changes the way education has to be shared. He contends that:

  • The Internet provides freedom against the real-world obstacles. The student is able to learn without geographic restraints, at any time and at one’s pace.
  • It has created a “new culture of learning” characterized by “bottom-up learning” where students collaborate in exploring, innovating, and creating new knowledge.
  • It has and still is supporting a fluid intelligence and connectivism where the information is distributed and used on “just-in-time-basis”.
  • It has, and still is developing autonomous and individualized learners. Students decide what they want to learn, how they want to learn and where they want to learn it.

From the points above, it is no question that internet is really a powerful tool in education. Social platforms such as Facebook, Twitter, YouTube and many more, have shown such a potential and quite a number of institutions have tried them and proved positive feedback.

However, it should be noted that Internet alone cannot facilitate the education. There should be platforms, applications, or software’s with different functions to make open education a success. In the next paragraphs, Special attention will be paid to Social Network Apps’ role in Open education

What is Social Network Apps?

In order to understand the meaning of the term “social network apps”, it is important to consider the meaning of “social media” which refers to a collection of Internet-based applications and platforms which facilitate the “creation and exchange” of “user-generated content” Alabdulkareem (2015, p 215). Such a collection of applications and platforms include Facebook, Telegram, Myspace, YouTube, Twitter, and WhatsApp. Through these platforms, people create communities with similar or common interests, such as; teachers group – where they can share their teaching experiences, discoveries, challenges and teaching and learning resources which can improve students learning experiences; Students group – where discussions of problems, assignments, sharing materials can be done and many more. The social aspect of this social media is very crucial to education as it answers the question of creation of content and sharing.

The role of Social Network Applications in Open Education

An education process is a social act in nature. It needs interaction for one to learn. The social apps are built on that aspect of interaction, be it content-person interaction, person to person interaction, or person-content-person interaction. Today, where people socialize virtually than ever, education is, therefore, taking such a virtual direction. In the context of open education, that is the best way. The existing social apps have and are helping support open education. However, there is still a lot of work to be done in order to maximize the already existing applications to increase access to open education. And also, it is important to note that one application cannot be enough, better ways, methods, and means must be decided in order to make education more accessible without constraints. Consider the following specific features in which the social network apps can play a role in enhancing and increasing access to open education.

Handy feature; Most of the social applications are designed to be installed and used on smartphones to provide the ability to use on the go. This feature is very important compared to the web-based platforms, which may only require a desktop or personal computer due to compatibility issues. In this way, people are able to use the open content anytime, anywhere.

Reduced open content access cost: Nowadays, it is possible to get a nice smartphone at a very affordable price compared to computers which are relatively expensive. The cost is already a hindrance to some people who want access to open content but with cheap smartphones and applications, the barrier to open educational resources is eliminated or reduced.

Easy to code/program an app: Massachusetts Institute of Technology, developed a platform or software (AppInventor) which makes it possible for everyone even without prior knowledge of coding or programming to develop any application that one may need. The software aim is to increase production, creation, and sharing of content in many various ways such as games and educational apps. All that one need is to imagine how the resources can be presented and used through Apps. This is providing freedom to educational movements and individuals who wish to share resources with the masses.

Offline feature; There is quite a number of apps that once you download and install, they work in offline mode since the content does not need an update on daily basis. For instance, the Amazon App has a number of free books, novels, magazines which once downloaded can be used for as long as one can. Having such offline applications reduces or decreases the cost of internet data on a daily basis which then opens up opportunities for the poor to access education.

Interaction and collaboration feature: The applications which require person content interaction or collaboration promote autonomy among learners this is an important factor for students as it increases the standard and quality of the content and learning. For instance, a teacher may initiate a debate among the students via WhatsApp. Students may debate by commenting on one another. Each time a student may wish to comment he might try to go deeper with the discussion topic by sharing related material which is very important in building new knowledge. In addition, it has been revealed that social apps such as Twitter, when used in the education context, develops students’ academic way of expression and communicating. Students make sure that the content they post is free from grammar and language issues (BBC ACTIVE, 2010). In addition, when posts receive comments, likes or dislikes, it creates the opportunity for them to think in a more analytical manner which is an important skill in the learning process.

Variation of apps: There are, around 3 million apps on Android app store, and over 2 million on Apple’s App store by 2017 (The Statistics Portal). This means a lot in the field of open education as many people have access to content and can create and share in different ways. Well, known apps such as the OpenStax and Khan Academy has quite a number of books, articles, and other teaching and learning resources which is accessible to many. Many users who have and still are using these apps are benefitting a lot in situations where there are no books and new and updated information in their schools.

Conclusion

Social network applications have an important role in open education. Its nature proves that they can increase access to open educational resources to both teachers and students and increase engagement and collaboration in the learning process by changing the perspective that teaching and learning only occurs at a specific time and place to the perspective that education is a “social act” that has no specific time and place. As people become more virtually connected and digitally socializing, it is therefore important that open educational resources be produced in many various forms and shared in many various social media platforms, specifically, through Social Network Applications in order to promote access to Open Education.

References

Alabdulkareem, S. A. (2015). Exploring the Use and the Impacts of Social Media on Teaching and Learning Science in Saudi. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 182, 213-224. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.04.758

App stores: number of apps in leading app stores 2017. (n.d.). Retrieved February 27, 2018, from https://www.statista.com/statistics/276623/number-of-apps-available-in-leading-app-stores/

Blessinger, P., & Bliss, T. (2017). Open Education: International Perspectives in Higher Education. doi:10.11647/OBP.0103

DiGangi, C. (2017, April 28). The average student loan debt in every state. Retrieved February 27, 2018, from https://www.usatoday.com/story/money/personalfinance/2017/04/28/average-student-loan-debt-every-state/100893668/

How social media is changing education, BBCActive, (n.d). Retrieved February 23, 2018, from http://www.bbcactive.com/BBCActiveIdeasandResources/Howsocialmediaischangingeducation.aspx

Jhangiani, R., & Biswas-Diener, R. (2017). Open: the philosophy and practices that are revolutionizing education and science. London: Ubiquity Press. doi: https://doi.org/10.5334/bbc

Levy, P. (2001). Cyberculture (Vol. 4). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.

OEC. (n.d.). About The Open Education Consortium. Retrieved February 27, 2018, from http://www.oeconsortium.org/about-oec/

Seylwn, N. (2014). The Internet and Education [PDF]. https://www.bbvaopenmind.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/03/BBVA-OpenMind-Technology-Innovation-Internet-Education-Sociology-Neil-Selwyn-Internet-and-Education.pdf.

What is open education? (n.d.). Retrieved February 27, 2018, from https://opensource.com/resources/what-open-education

Wiley, D., & Green, C. (2012). Why Openness in Education? In Game changers: education and information technologies (pp. 81-89). EDUCAUSE. doi:https://library.educause.edu/~/media/files/library/2012/5/pub72036-pdf.pdf

My summaries from Mike Wesch’s YouTube Videos

Students Helping Students

https://youtu.be/_npqbMKzHl8

The acts portrayed in the video are not rare or new to many people however powerful and inspiring especially by looking at how beneficial they are when students in need are rescued from the economic and social challenges they face at the university. This all comes from the cooperative behavior of the students at this university. However, the message becomes very powerful and significant when shared online giving the opportunity to people from other parts of the world to be inspired and therefore imitate the same the act and help others too. I am pretty sure that such acts portrayed in this video have already been imitated somewhere. This shows how powerful the technology can be used to change the way we live and facilitate solve the problems that we face in our lives.

The Vision of students today

https://youtu.be/dGCJ46vyR9o

The video portrays how traditional models and methodologies of teaching and learning are not really benefiting the students. It demonstrates from students’ feelings how the authoritative way of teaching and learning where teachers own the knowledge and transfer it to students does not benefit students. The video shows what students would love to learn in schools and how. Students want to learn meaningful experiences which would help them solve everyday life challenges or problems. They want, in fact, we want to discuss the contemporary issues affecting us now and the future Technology is transforming the way we socialize, communicate and share information. And therefore, it must be integrated into the teaching and learning. As we become more virtually connected and collaborative, education must take the same direction. It must be collaborative and not individualized. It must be meaningful and connected to our lives. Gone are the times that teachers were the fonts of knowledge and students as receivers. Teachers must be the facilitators of learning. Teachers should guide students towards getting answers to the meaningful questions of our time. Students must explore, discover and share as much knowledge as they can. With information and communication technology, all this can be achieved. Classrooms must have invisible walls where what is being learned is applicable in the real world.

The Machine is changing us

https://youtu.be/09gR6VPVrpw

In this video, the machine is changing us, Michael Wesch discusses the impact of communication technologies such as YouTube on our lives in the virtual or networked world. He explains how such media technologies are transforming the way we connect and relate to others. With concrete examples, Michael has shown how some small social actions turns out to be a global social movement. Consider the 350.org a climate change movement which started locally but now had become one of the global climate change movement with members worldwide joining daily and initiating projects against the increase in global warming and climate change. All these being mediated by internet machine and therefore creating new forms of social relationships. On the question of who controls the media, Wesch contends that everyone is part of the control and has a voice. This is true in the sense that we have the opportunity to react to the information that we come across on the network. We do come to realize ourselves better also through the network socialization. The virtual groups that we voluntarily join and take positions on issues that interest us make us realize who we are.

The Machine is us/ing us.

https://youtu.be/NLlGopyXT_g

In this video, Michael Wesch gives us a very compelling easy but profound explanation on how the internet technology web 2.0 connects us and transforms our way of life. From television technology where we only consumed information, we have reached the point of creating and using the information on the web. The ability to create, tag, share, edit, critique, comment, hyperlink etc. makes us more connected and collaborative and therefore promotes a collective intelligence, a concept Pierre Levy described in his book “Cyberculture”. The access to, and opportunity to collect different kinds of information gives an opportunity for educators to think critically about the current and future of education. It means that our educational models should be restructured in the way that makes information and communication technology more meaningful in education. It means that new methods of teaching and learning which fully engages students in creating new knowledge have to be implemented.

AUTHENTICITY AND TRANSPARENCY IN THE NETWORKED SOCIETY

The interconnectedness of the computer systems and the internet has impacted the way our society is organized including our behaviors. In the cyber or virtual world, people can become anyone they would want to be by self-profiling in a manner that suits them. People join different groups with different interests and in such a way they build another identity which can be different from the other virtual community groups they are members of. Suler, J.R.(2002), in his article; “Identity Management in Cyberspace”, echoed on the interesting part of the cyberspace by saying:

…One of the interesting things about the internet is the opportunity it offers people to present themselves in a variety of different ways. You can alter your style of being just slightly or indulge in wild experiments with your identity by changing your age, history, personality, physical appearance, even your gender. The username you choose, the details you do or don’t indicate about yourself, the information presented on your personal web page, the persona or avatar you assume in an online community… (Suler, J.R. (2002))

While this might sound positive, on the other hand, it raises the question of how authentic and transparent we are, how real are the emotions that we do express on the social platforms such as Facebook, YouTube etc., and whether the information we come across on the internet is authentic and transparent or not. People do press dis/likes on Facebook posts, and even use emoticons etc to express feelings, but are these acts rational or emotional? Whether this might be or might not, the point is that our true self and how we perceive the world around us may influence the choice of whether we regard something authentic and transparent in the cyber world where people tend to have multiple identities.

It is important to understand that, the internet is a technological tool for communication rather than a tool that transforms our identity. Fierro (2017), supports this by emphasizing that whilst social networks facilitate interaction between and among people, they should not be the factor in determining the identity of a being, she (Fierro, 2017) continues saying “a valuable resource that makes it easier for people to identify their essence is authenticity” (Translated from Spanish) (Fierro, (2017).  Being authentic and transparent can only be achieved by true self as a member of the cyber world. The fact that we are not only consumers of information but rather the producers too, gives us the opportunity to reflect on whether we want to be the authentic and transparent or not. In my opinion, I think multiple identities comes as a result of different interests people want to achieve while connecting. For instance, seeking for relationships can be one factor that can make a person create a new cyber/digital identity. However, it should be noted that this does not only occur in the digital world, the real/physical world does have the same issues. In fact, people do have masks in different situations. In a job interview, people may try as much as possible to impress the jury by ensuring that they are smart, open-minded, easy to collaborate, etc. while outside that environment, they are not really who they claim to be.

Information that we do access from the internet might be authentic and transparent but still, there might interest behind it. Governments or political figures will make sure to win the public opinion by making sure that information they disseminate should hit the peoples’ hearts and take the decision in favor of them. Recently, we have been alarmed by the issue of fake news circulating in the media such as Facebook, WhatsApp etc. with the aim of manipulating people and even creating havoc among them. People do post videos, images, messages, etc for different reasons. We react by like/dislike and share buttons in a manner that in my opinion is sometimes emotional than rational. In some cases, we are not conscious of what that act means. Maybe all this is because we are in search of fun or happiness after a long stressful day or we want to forget something that has been bothering us etc.

In summary, the question of authenticity and transparency in a networked society is a complex one and needs more attention. On the positive side, Pierre Levy (2001) had talked of the collective intelligence in his book titled “Cyberculture” where people create and share knowledge through different platforms such as Wikis.  Understanding the different reasons for online socialization is crucial to whether what we see and experience in the cyberspace is authentic or not. The responsibility of being authentic and transparent still remains ours. Our ways of interconnecting must be accompanied by positive societal values, virtues, and ethics.  Before we consume, we must first analyze and criticize the information. We must think from different perspectives before taking an action. The internet or the communication systems are just tools and cannot change our identities.We are the ones to be authentic and transparent.

References:

Fierro, N. N. (2017, July). Las Redes Sociales Como Parte de la Identidad actual [Web log post]. Retrieved January 6, 2018, from http://www.e-consulta.com/opinion/2017-07-20/las-redes-sociales-como-parte-de-la-identidad-actual

Lévy, P. (2001). Cyberculture (Vol. 4). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.

Suler, J.R. (2002). Identity Management in Cyberspace. Journal of Applied Psychoanalytic Studies, 4, 455-460.

 

CYBERCULTURE: The Impact of Emerging Computer Networks and Internet According to Pierre Levy (2001)

The coming of computer networks and internet technology has brought forward a different way of socialization and the way we perceive our culture. Physical or face to face socialization has reduced but in fact, socializing, in general, has improved and increased. Sending and receiving messages at a speed is no longer a problem. Talking to people from around the world is a thing of a fingertip than in the past when people had to travel all way from one end to the other just for a talk. With computer network and the internet, relationship bonds have increased and circles of peers or friendship have increased. The economic platform has changed such that we have seen the different way we get and use the money. Introduction of digital or cryptocurrencies has now changed the whole perspective of money. Digital platforms for buying and selling merchandise such as Amazon has revolutionized our way of conducting business. Moving with cash is gradually transitioning to moving with electronic money. Development of artificial Intelligent robots, driverless cars, drones etc. are and will keep changing our way of living. All these changes in our culture are what is causing or creating a new culture, the cyberculture.

What is cyberculture? And it’s Implications?

In order to understand the meaning of cyberculture, we must turn to the work of Pierre Levy, a French sociologist who has studied and published a conclusive and descriptive work surrounding the topic of digital communication and how it has, is and will keep impacting and implicating our society, the global society. In his book “Cyberculture” by Pierre Levy, translated into English in 2001 by Robert Bononno, he starts by defining the network, otherwise referred to as cyberspace as “a new medium of communication that arose through the global interconnection of computer networks” (Levy, 2001. p XVI), He further expresses that such communication is not only about the information it carries but also how people globally get and use it. From this starting point, Levy, (2001) defined cyberculture as how cyberspace implicates our practices, attitudes, way of thinking and our values.  His work is so appealing as it gives a double perspective of the implications of digital information and communication technologies.

As per Levy, (2001), technology is the product of societal needs. And as we produce or advance with the technology, we start to condition or shape our way of living. He stresses that technology does not “determine” our society. He (Levy, 2001) states that technology is not totally good or bad. But its impact, be it positive or negative depends on how and why we produce and let it for use. the increased interconnectedness of people in the cyberspace and its technological advancement has made the virtual communication almost as equal as to face to face communication.

In addition to the impact of technology, Levy, (2001) mentions that the advancement has promoted the culture of collective intelligence. Today with access to, and opportunity to create and spread information, people from all corners of the globe are able to share and build new knowledge easily. When problems and challenges arrive, people are able to post them in the virtual communities to ask for help or simply calling directly by skype or any other form to that specific person who is ready to help. People in different virtual communities have worked together to collectively produce important technological items or knowledge. For instance, Linux OS has been developed collectively, A lot of content from the Wikipedia has been collectively produced. People have created websites, blogs etc. and shared the links to each other, a form of creating collective intelligence.

Levy (2001) did not miss on the negative impact of digital information and communication technologies. Some of the points discussed are very common. For instance, it is true that there is a development of computer addiction. Many people now can no longer live without computer/tablet/smartphone proximity just to be connected to the globe. Just as how collective intelligence develops, “collective stupidity” may arise, or is arising in the same way. There are many circumstances where some people have made viral, information that is incorrect for the sake of fooling people or for the purposes of incorrectly manipulating the population. We have seen in some cases that the political tensions have been promoted and sparked conflicts or wars via the digital media such as television, Facebook, WhatsApp, twitter etc. Levy, (2001) also mentioned of the overloading of information as another negative impact. This is no question as per freedom to create and publish whatever people can think of at the cyberspace or internet.

Significant examples of Cyberculture

There are many examples of technologies that characterize the emerged cyberculture. These include the e-commerce, Online gaming, and Social networks.

In e-commerce, business is done electronically. People can place orders and buy different items and services just by a few clicks and later have the products. This is different from the traditional way of business when individuals or companies have to travel all the way to, let’s say, USA and China to purchase the needed items. In the same category. Money has and is being digitized and accessed 24/7. The coming of mobile money services in the developing countries such as Malawi has helped people in both cities and remote areas to have access to easy sending and receiving without walking a distance. The introduction of digital currencies such as Bitcoin, Lite coin etc. is revolutionizing the way we perceive the concept of money. It is no question that this might be the future of money when the whole globe is well interconnected.

In online gaming, Individuals from around the world connect via games and take roles or positions where they compete. Pokémon is one of the games designed on the basis of the treasure-hunt game. where users can connect in search of Pokémon. Another example of such games is the Chess. Where users connect and play chess together. All this characterizes the concept of cyberculture.

In social networks, people with similar or collective interests from around the world get connected via sites like Facebook, Instagram, linked in, myspace etc. They would share their ideas and interests, photos, and videos etc. Facebook, for instance, has over a billion users and inside this big group, users have their circles with different interests. It has become one way of initiating friendships, simply by looking at the biography of the people who share a common interest and request them for friendship. It is also one way of sending and getting the information very fast than ever before.

In summary, Pierre Levy (2001) has provided an enlightened work on the meaning of cyberculture. A culture that is characterized by its interconnectedness through cyberspace and internet. A culture that has transitioned from just consuming information to creating. A culture that, apart from living in physical communities it also lives in virtual communities or social networks such as Facebook, Twitter etc. which are huge and global. It is a culture that is changing from traditional collective intelligence to a collective intelligence over the internet. Websites such as Wikipedia, or television which by now, have a huge number of channels promotes this concept of collective intelligence.

Reference

Levy, P. (2001). Cyberculture (Vol. 4). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.